Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Leblanc v. Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Joseph Leblanc
Defendant:
LA Dept of Safety & Corrections, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Capt Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 3:2021cv01421
Plaintiff:
Theodore Smith, III and Theodore W. Smith, III
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden May, RWO Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivens v. Carother et al
as 4:2019cv04073
Defendant:
Lt. Ford and Lt. . Carother
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRELL v. FORD
as 1:2018cv00129
Respondent:
WILLIAMS, Lt. FORD, HOLLOMAN and others
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TERRELL v. FORD et al
as 1:2018cv00126
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE), HOLLOMAN, CROSS and others
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Godbolt v. Powell et al
as 4:2015cv02564
Plaintiff:
Sevren Da'Sean Godbolt
Defendant:
Joseph Powell, Lt Ford, Donovan Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. McGhee et al
as 0:2015cv02437
Plaintiff:
Markies Terrill Collins
Defendant:
Lt McGhee, Sgt Johnson, Ofc Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Anderson, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Albert King
Defendant:
Officer Anderson , D. T. Marshall , Wanda J. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Marshall et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00722
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Austin
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, Gina Savage, A. D. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sturkey v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2008cv02758
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Sturkey
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Willie Eagleton, Lt Ford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
