Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Josiah Speach v. Sheriff Ted Jackson, et al
as 16-11437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSIAH MUNKUNDA SPEACH
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF TED JACKSON, JAIL DIRECTOR ADGER, LT. MARTIN, Grievance Officer; DID: 2175 and others
Burton v. Perry et al
as 5:2015ct03305
Plaintiff:
Michael Burton
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Mr. Hale, Dr. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kates v. Martin et al
as 1:2015cv13412
Plaintiff:
David E. Kates
Defendant:
Lt. Martin and Tonya Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitmore v. Lamb, etc., et al.
as 1:2015cv07351
Plaintiff:
Troy D Whitmore
Defendant:
Warden Lamb, Davis, Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 8:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
Carmichael T Flowers
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of , South Carolina Dept of Corr , Bryan P Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. Lt. Martin et al
as 3:2014cv00853
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Reese
Defendant:
Lt. Martin, Lt. D Robsinson, Sgt. Sommerall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Davis et al
as 2:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Andre W. Wise
Defendant:
Keith Davis, J. Boone, Captin Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritte et al v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv09331
Plaintiff:
Calvin Merritte, Stanley Donahue, Darryl Gullens and others
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Salvador Godinez, Michael Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Eagleton et al
as 2:2013cv02379
Plaintiff:
Kristopher W Berry
Defendant:
Willie Eagleton, Nurse Brown, Lt Brayboy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fresquez v. Minks, et al
as 13-1155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY DAMASIO FRESQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF TED MINKS, MICHAEL FISH, Detention Service Manager; JOHN DOE (CAPTAIN), March 5, 2010, LT. MARTINALLI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
