Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ferguson v. Holmes et al
as 1:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Lacy Ferguson
Defendant:
Lt. Colonel Holmes, Dana Hartsell, Lt. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Coakley et al
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Raul Ortiz
Defendant:
LT D. Coakley, CT M. Duff, LT D. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Sanders et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Evon Stephens
Defendant:
Lt. Sanders and Captain Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hunter v. Breining et al
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Hunter
Defendant:
Cpl. Brewing, Sat. Aronld, Cpl. Faulkner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currington v. Thomas et al
as 1:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Kermit W Currington, III
Defendant:
Tanisha Thomas, Lt. Sanders, Officer Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2014cv04855
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Taylor
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Willie L Eagleton, Amy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorodsky et al v. US Attorney et al
as 1:2012cv04420
Defendant:
Justice Betsy Barros, Ellen Bieben, Anthony Bocola and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Sorodsky and Michail Sorodsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Hammonds et al
as 1:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
Terry W Fuller
Defendant:
Teressa J Hammonds, Sheriff John Doe and Lt. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Schwartz et al
as 3:2010cv00256
Plaintiff:
Julius James
Defendant:
Gregory C Schwartz, W Harris, TACT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
