Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Deven Deschepper v. USA
as 26-2170
Petitioner:
DEVEN LUCAS DESCHEPPER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jenna Kaltved v. Brad Wise, et al
as 26-2060
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kaltved, the homeowners who still live at 15581 Iodine Street NW, Ramsey, Minnesota and Jenna Kaltved, the homeowners who still live at 15581 Iodine Street NW, Ramsey, Minnesota
Defendant:
Brad Wise, individually and as Sheriff of Anoka County, Lucas Christoffersen, individually (Deputy Sheriff who executed sale), Richard Kreyer, individually and as Civil Process Supervisor, Anoka County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00593
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Darious Lucas v. Doris Falkenrath
as 26-2065
Petitioner:
Darious A. Lucas
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Alonso-Tomas v. Blanche
as 26-60382
Petitioner:
Lucas Alonso-Tomas
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Lucas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00414
Plaintiff:
James Lucas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Acoff v. Lovelace et al
as 2:2026cv00890
Plaintiff:
Mario DeWayne Acoff
Defendant:
Greg Lovelace, Sen. Cam Ward, Hal Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kender Neftali Lucas-Marroquin v. Todd W. Blanche
as 26-2091
Petitioner:
KENDER NEFTALI LUCAS-MARROQUIN
Respondent:
TODD W. BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
