Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Long & Luder, P.A. v. Slagle, Bernard & Gorman
as 4:2013cv01052
Plaintiff:
Long & Luder, P.A.
Defendant:
Slagle, Bernard & Gorman
Counter_claimant:
Slagle, Bernard & Gorman
Counter_defendant:
Long & Luder, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isham v. Luder et al
as 2:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Michael Darrin Isham
Defendant:
Susan L Luder, Clayton Alec Lynas, Connie Contes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isham v. Luder
as 3:2013cv08126
Plaintiff:
Michael Darrin Isham
Defendant:
Susan L Luder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Frietas et al
as 3:2013cv00667
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Harrison
Defendant:
Steve Frietas, Bunting, Munson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gebrezgie v. Luders et al
as 5:2012cv04358
Plaintiff:
Yohannes Tekie Gebrezgie
Defendant:
Luders, Kolman, Toby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Block v. Luder et al
as 2:2011cv02068
Plaintiff:
Curtis L Block
Defendant:
Susan L Luder, Paul Kittredge and Maricopa County Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veysada v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv04283
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Veysada
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons , C Linaweaver , Ms. Simms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson
as 5:2011cv01975
Plaintiff:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Defendant:
Toby, Wood, E. Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2008cv03433
Plaintiff:
Eric James Baker, Eric James Baker and Eric James Baker
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, Bill Cogbill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fannie Mae v. Dieudonne
as 1:2007cv02548
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae and Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Luders Dieudonne
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
