Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Kai Lyman v. Phila Court of Common Pleas, et al
as 17-2667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAI LYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION, THE HONORABLE MARGARET T. MURPHY, Administrative Judge and ANNE MARIE B. COYLE, Trial Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Coburn v. Lyman Products Corporation
as 2:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Paul Coburn
Defendant:
Lyman Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dean Phillips v. Beth Rietema, et al
as 16-36074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN ERVIN PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
BETH RENEE RIETEMA, THURSTON COUNTY, WA, CITY OF TUMWATER, WA and others
LYMAN v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2016cv05191
Plaintiff:
KAI LYMAN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MARGARET T. MURPHY and ANNE MARIE B. COYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francini v. East Haddam et al
as 3:2016cv01568
Plaintiff:
William Francini
Defendant:
Town of East Haddam , East Haddam Planning and Zoning Commission , Emmett J. Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Swensen, et al
as 16-4103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIJAH SWENSEN, TRAVIS KEARL, ALICIA MARIE WASHINGTON and others
Hines et al v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2016cv00256
Plaintiff:
Kevin A Hines , Paige Hines and Parker Hines
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Rodney Lyman Warner III, Taylore Dalas Leggett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER v. WHEELER et al
as 3:2016cv00058
Defendant:
MATT BAI, LARRY BUSCHON, TOM CIBROWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.