Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Bailey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv02227
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Katrena Lynn Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BAILEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv09805
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
LYNN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sixth District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2021cv01284
Defendant:
Wandy Taylor, Tim McFalls, Rocky Raffle and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia Muslim Voter Project, Latino Community Fund of Georgia, Women Watch Afrika and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Harpo-Brown v. Bailey et al
as 1:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Augusta Richmond County Commission, Richmond County Board of Elections and Lynn Bailey
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv01530
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lynn Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
USA v. Barry Bailey
as 19-10763
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY LYNN BAILEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Jamie Bailey
as 19-5363
Respondent:
GEORGIA CROWELL, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: JAMIE LYNN BAILEY
BAILEY v. USA
as 1:2019cv00400
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DAVID LYNN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bailey v. Twomey, et al
as 19-8004
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY WALKER, ROBERT SANFORD and DANIEL TWOMEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBIN LYNN BAILEY
BAILEY v. USA
as 1:2019cv00094
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DAVID LYNN BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
