Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01000
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
GAMELL v. MAYS et al
as 3:2023cv24097
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CARLTON GAMELL, JR
Defendant:
M MAYS and KILOLO KAJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Newby v. Mays et al
as 1:2023cv04780
Plaintiff:
raylando d newby and Raylando D. Newby
Defendant:
United State Postal Service, lorri m mays and Lorri M. Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Mays v. Paul
as 5:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Marcello M Mays
Respondent:
Warden Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Warden Paul
as 5:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Marcello M Mays
Defendant:
Warden Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00867
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Mays
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Drayton v. Newman et al
as 7:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Drayton
Defendant:
Sgt. Newman, S. M. Snead, J. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mai v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
April M. Mai
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
May v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Trisha M. May
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mays v. Sitot
as 2:2022cv03035
Defendant:
Tavon M. Mays, Ritbey Sitot and Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
