Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Montes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01565
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Monica M. Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monte v. Vance et al
as 1:2018cv09595
Defendant:
Kenn Kern, Hon. Mark Dwyer, Larry Spollen and others
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Monte, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTE v. KESSLING et al
as 2:2018cv11363
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KILLORAN, MICHAEL J. SATZ, HONORABLE LISA PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK M. MONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen v. Fox et al
as 2:2016cv02574
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
R W Fox, D E Cueva, D Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monte et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08893
Plaintiff:
Cecilia M. Monte and Nofrio A. Monte, Jr.
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bohensky et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06773
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Bohensky , Laurel L. Heath, Sr. , Martha Herwald and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montes v. SKV Investments, LLC
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Guillermo M. Montes
Defendant:
SKV Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Davenport et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2012cv00710
Plaintiff:
Donald Davenport , Montague Agee , Michael Alston and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Montes v. Drever Aberdeen L.P. et al
as 4:2011cv04153
Plaintiff:
Guillermo M. Montes
Defendant:
Drever Aberdeen L.P., Concierge Management Services, LLC, Trinet HR Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
