Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Partin v. META PLATFORMS, INC., formerly known as Facebook, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv07148
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., formerly known as Facebook, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Instagram LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Zaya Partin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Courtney Partin
as 26-5603
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
COURTNEY GARVIN PARTIN
PARTIN v. LANGSTON
as 5:2026cv00150
Plaintiff:
LAYTON CHASE PARTIN
Defendant:
RICHARD DANIEL LANGSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reedy et al v. Dillon et al
as 7:2026cv00276
Plaintiff:
Regan Dwayne Reedy, Ahura Mazda, Amesha Spentas and others
Respondent:
Elizabeth K. Dillon, Robert Ballou, Thomas T. Cullen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PARTIN v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv02384
Plaintiff:
BETTY J PARTIN
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tenpenny v. Partin
as 4:2026cv00011
Petitioner:
Richard S Tenpenny
Respondent:
Chad Partin and Vanessa Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tenpenny v. Partin
as 4:2026cv00012
Petitioner:
Richard S Tenpenny
Respondent:
Chad Partin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Earl v. Jasper County et al
as 4:2026cv00006
Estate:
Tara Earl
Defendant:
Jasper County and Dakota Partin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Partin
as 3:2026cv00113
Petitioner:
Terrance Joseph Adams
Respondent:
Chad Partin and William Lockhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2025cv02452
Plaintiff:
SEAN DIXON
Defendant:
LLOYD ARNOLD, LAURA R. BODKIN, TRENT ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
