Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Robinson v. Linn et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Victor L Robinson
Defendant:
Matt Linn, Baily Anderson, Hellen M Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Allen v. Helder et al
as 5:2022cv05016
Plaintiff:
Joe M. Allen
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Helder, Prosecutor Matt Durrett, Prosecutor Dennis Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Terrance Allen
as 21-2046
Defendant / Appellant:
Terrance M. Allen
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Robert M. Allen Family Limited Partnership v. Specialty Retailers, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Allen Family Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Specialty Retailers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Larry Olivarez v. Rodney Brown, et al
as 16-4028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Olivarez
Defendant - Appellee:
Rodney D. Brown, Correctional Property Sergeant, Marquis L. Lundy, Correctional Lieutenant, EARU, Darren Daniels, Correctional Sergeant and others
United States v. Terrance Allen
as 16-3253
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Terrance M. Allen
Reginald Dunahue v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 16-2592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Grant Harris, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry May, former Deputy Director and others
Clark v. Etherly et al
as 2:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Buford Clark
Defendant:
Etherly , M Allen and Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
