Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Allen v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00969
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, David Shinn, Trinity Food Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent M Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Wash, et al
as 4:2021cv00845
Defendant:
Staffmark Investments, LLC, Danyel Turner and Janet Wash
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. DURHAM CO. DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv00147
Defendant:
ROBERT DUSTINBURGER, OFC. ELMORE, ARAMARK and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv00145
Defendant:
CHIEF PRIGNANO, JENET J. LENNON, DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. EMMONS
as 1:2021cv00590
Petitioner:
Deantwan M. Allen, Sr
Respondent:
Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
SGT. CLARK, MRS. SLADE, DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN and DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. DURHAM CO. DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant:
SGT. CLARK, SHERIFF CLERANCE F. BIRKHEAD, LIEUTENANT HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2021cv00088
Defendant:
CHIEF PRIGNANO, DEPUTY WALTON, DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. DURHAM COUNTY DET. FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT PEELE, ARAMARK, MAJOR E. BAZMORE and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
