Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ELK v. KARPINSKI et al
as 1:2021cv02491
Plaintiff:
AL ELK and AL T. ELK
Defendant:
JARED M BOYD, KIMBERLY KARPINSKI, BRENNAN F SULLIVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yazzi v. McKinley County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2019cv00167
Defendant:
McKinley County Adult Detention Center, Tony M Boyd and McKinley County Board of Commissioners
Plaintiff:
Veda Yazzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Commodore v. Williams et al
as 2:2012cv02957
Plaintiff:
Kunta J. Commodore
Defendant:
Glen Williams, Gwen Rooks and M. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Applewhaite v. Matthew Shinton, et al
as 12-5197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew Applewhaite
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew Shinton, Luann Winston, Erin Walsh and others
Boyd v. TCR Enterprises
as 4:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Boyd
Defendant:
TCR Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sallie et al v. Collins #14012-040 et al
as 1:2009cv01114
Plaintiff:
Sherod D. Sallie, Omar M. Boyd, Larry T. Hooks and others
Defendant:
Andrew Thomas Collins #14012-040, Bernard Hall and Benton Harbor, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
APPLEWHAITE v. SHINTON et al
as 1:2009cv02195
Plaintiff:
ANDREW APPLEWHAITE
Defendant:
MATTHEW SHINTON, LUANN WINSTON, ERIN WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Boyd
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Heather J. Fong, Michael Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nicholas, et al v. Boyd, et al
as 07-1444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NICHOLAS, individually and as successor in interest to the Estate of Demetrios John Nicholas and BRENDA I NICHOLAS, individually and as successor in interest to the Estate of Demetrios John Nicholas
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD M. BOYD, ROBERT ALLEN, HAROLD CHEUVRONT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
