Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Berman et al v. Bodum USA, Inc.
as 1:2026cv09731
Defendant:
Bodum USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Insler and Edward Berman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Derrick King v. Sandra Duggan, et al
as 26-3696
Defendant:
Robert Peirce & Associates PC, Fine Kaplan & Black RPC, Lynch Carpenter LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Martin King
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62917
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62916
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Zanzarella v. US
as 27-1025
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ZANZARELLA, 334 FISHKILL AVE. LLC, 544 MAIN STREET LLC and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Solomon v. Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv14603
Defendant:
Eski, Inc. doing business as Pixmob, Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts, Inc., Legacy Lifecare, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis J Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Berman v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv04235
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Berman
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-13353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Berman v. Bort et al
as 6:2026cv01779
Petitioner:
Preston Berman
Defendant:
Alison Bort and James Diegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.