Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Dwyer v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Dwyer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Roderick English v. Fazal Khan
as 14-6688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK JEROME ENGLISH
Defendant - Appellee:
FAZAL KHAN, RICHARD S. JOHNSON, LPN MICHELLE D. FOX and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Malom Group AG et al
as 2:2013cv02280
Defendant:
Anthony B. Brandel, Sean P. Finn, Hans-Jurg Lips and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brandel et al
as 2:2013cv02279
Defendant:
Anthony B. Brandel, Sean P. Finn, Hans-Jurg Lips and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
English v. Khan et al
as 1:2013cv02857
Plaintiff:
Roderick English
Defendant:
Fazal Khan, Richard S Johnson, Michelle D Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DWYER v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2010cv84134
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. DWYER
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dwyer v. Coffee Creek Correctional Institution
as 3:2010cv01093
Respondent:
Coffee Creek Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Brenden M. Dwyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dwyer v. State of Maine
as 10-1510
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL M. DWYER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MAINE
DWYER v. MAINE, STATE OF
as 1:2009cv00379
Petitioner:
DANIEL M DWYER
Respondent:
MAINE, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
