Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gonzalez-Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Jose M Gonzalez-Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gonzalez v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05042
Plaintiff:
Jose M Gonzalez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Bianca M. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez Romero v. Saul
as 4:2020cv05214
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Jenny M Gonzalez Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzalez v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01429
Plaintiff:
Shannon M. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv03118
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Sonia M. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GONZALEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2017cv07098
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA M GONZALEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00384
Plaintiff:
Maricella M Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzalez v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00864
Plaintiff:
Jasmine M. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv01258
Plaintiff:
Tammy M. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.