Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Weaver v. Daneke
as 4:2026cv00824
Plaintiff:
Mae Weaver
Defendant:
William Daneke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Weaver v. Daneke
as 4:2026cv00825
Plaintiff:
Mae Weaver
Defendant:
William Daneke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gursky v Deiderich et al
as 3:2026cv00929
Defendant:
Rena Mae Gursky, Robert A Dillon, Kourtney Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Selene Finance, LP
as 1:2026cv03769
Plaintiff:
Reki Mae Parker
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Castleberry v. NewRez LLC, et al
as 6:2026cv00436
Defendant:
Government National Mortgage Association, NewRez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Ginnie Mae and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07842
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Burrell v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv07589
Plaintiff:
Ida Mae Burrell
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. EFFINGHAM COUNTY
as 4:2026cv00167
Petitioner:
HATTIE MAE BROWN
Respondent:
Effingham County
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CUARESMA v. Skopos Financial, LLC d/b/a Reprise Financial
as 2:2026cv06954
Plaintiff:
PAULINE MAE CUARESMA
Defendant:
Skopos Financial, LLC d/b/a Reprise Financial
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.