Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Rodney Patton v. Andrea Tack
as 24-1482
Petitioner: RODNEY M. PATTON
Respondent: ANDREA S. TACK
McLaughlin v. E. Slye Holdings LLC et al.
as 1:2023cv02232
Plaintiff: Kristian M. McLaughlin
Defendant: E. Slye Holdings LLC doing business as ES Logistics and Kent M. Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Patton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv01209
Plaintiff: Tina M. Patton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Bray v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff: Thomas Harry Bray
Defendant: State of Oregon, D.O. M. Patton, Dr Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2023cv03306
Plaintiff: Regina Lewis
Defendant: Housing and Urban Development and Lynne M. Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cicel (Beijing) Science & Technology Co., Ltd. v. Misonix, Inc.
as 22-1834
Plaintiff / Appellant: Cicel (Beijing) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant / Appellee: Misonix, Inc.
Defendant: Stavros Vizirgianakis, Scott Ludecker, John Salerno and others
Patton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02242
Plaintiff: Rodney M. Patton
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Brad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Patton v. Davol, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff: Rodney M. Patton
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Brad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Montanez v. Price et al
as 3:2022cv00254
Plaintiff: Jose Montanez
Defendant: Paula Price, Dr. Mahlic, Ms. Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Misonix, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08513
Plaintiff: Christopher Taylor
Defendant: Misonix, Inc., Stavros Vizirgianakis, Patrick J. Beyer and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?