Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Evans et al v. Sabal Club Holdings, LLC et al
as 6:2026cv01676
Plaintiff:
Roy Evans and Cheyenne Featherly
Defendant:
Sabal Club Holdings, LLC, LMM Multifamily Management, LLC, Rachel Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
United States of America v. Roy
as 26-4877
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TONJA VAN ROY
Bailey v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2026cv00266
Plaintiff:
Roy L. Bailey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv02960
Plaintiff:
David Roy Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JARVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv02669
Plaintiff:
Kia Jarvis
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Kayla Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Roy v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv09015
Plaintiff:
Stephaney A. Roy
Defendant:
Avlon Industries, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. George
as 1:2026cv04281
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Roy Holmes
Defendant:
William Anthony George
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Daniels v. State of Florida
as 0:2026cv62068
Plaintiff:
Roy O. Daniels
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA - GUILFORD COUNTY
as 1:2026cv00736
Plaintiff:
ROY CARNELL BROWN, II
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA - GUILFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
