Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Magnum-Reign v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2026cv03243
Plaintiff:
Marcus Magnum-Reign
Defendant:
Dorothy Kennedy and DBK Alternative Housing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06841
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morales v. Delic et al
as 1:2026cv03151
Plaintiff:
Aracely Morales
Defendant:
Mirsad Delic and Magnum Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Fusilier v. City of Wichita Police Department, et al
as 26-3097
Plaintiff:
KAREN M. FUSILIER
Defendant:
WICHITA POLICE DEPARTMENT, EDWARD BROWER, CORRIE MCCLUSKEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Morales v. Mirsad et al
as 1:2026cv02164
Plaintiff:
Yene Morales
Defendant:
Delic Mirsad and Magnum Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Magnum Carbon Solutions, LLC v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv02663
Plaintiff:
Magnum Carbon Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Mittal v. Unilever PLC et al
as 3:2026cv02660
Plaintiff:
Anuradha Mittal
Defendant:
Unilever PLC, The Magnum Ice Cream Company N.V. and Jochanan Senf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brock v. Jackson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2026cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tommy Brock
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Janice Magnum, Lt. R. Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
