Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Denby, et al. v. Engstrom, et al.
as 26-3420
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. DENBY, a single man and ELIZABETH J. TORRES, a single woman
Defendant:
DAVID ENGSTROM, husband, JACOB H. ROBINSON, husband, CHRISTOPHER LAPRE, husband and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Manning v. Hyde Park Hospatality LLC et al
as 1:2026cv06024
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lavon Manning
Defendant:
Hyde Park Hospatality LLC, O'Hare Ventures II LLC and John/Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Manning v. Winborne
as 3:2026cv01664
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Manning
Defendant:
Byron C Winborne, Judge Cindy Ermatinger, Grace Pandithural and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Manning v. Jones
as 1:2026cv02824
Petitioner:
Marvin Manning
Respondent:
DeShawn Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OKUMA v. MAN INVESTMENTS USA HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2026cv04068
Defendant:
MAN INVESTMENTS USA HOLDINGS, INC., MAN GROUP, LTD, ANTOINE FORTERRE and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH OKUMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sx Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sadler et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04637
Plaintiff:
John Sadler, Jamiel Gustafson, Brandon Harvey and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv61445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
