Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Manship, Sr. v. Wetsel et al
as 5:2011cv00030
Defendant:
Marc Abrams, James K. Bailous, Randy Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
James Renwick Manship, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Manship, Sr. v. Thomson et al
as 5:2011cv00014
Defendant:
Marc Abrams, James K. Bailous, Alexander R. Iden and others
Plaintiff:
James Renwick Manship, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Manship v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2010cv01343
Plaintiff:
James Renwick Manship, Sr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ian Rodway, Leah E. Tarantino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANSHIP v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv05726
Plaintiff:
JOYCE MANSHIP
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chacon et al v. East Haven Police Dept et al
as 3:2010cv01692
Plaintiff:
Marcia Chacon , Wilfrido Matute , James Manship and others
Defendant:
East Haven Police Dept, Town of East Haven, Leonard Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
20 SOUTH GAS, INC. et al V. EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv06236
Plaintiff:
20 SOUTH GAS, INC., 520 SERVICE CENTER, INC., 36 MIDDLE RD., INC. and others
Defendant:
EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PIGGIE v. GIBBS et al
as 1:2009cv01190
Plaintiff:
CLYDE PIGGIE
Defendant:
HEATHER GIBBS, HEATHER GIBBS, M. HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manship v. Dept Homeland Sec et al
as 3:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
James Manship
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Sec, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Joanna Roppel and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
US v. James Manship, Sr.
as 09-4135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES RENWICK MANSHIP, SR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
