Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Hengle et al v. Curry et al
as 3:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
George Hengle and Lula Williams
Defendant:
Mark Curry, American Web Loan, Inc. , AWL, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Estate of Harold Waymon English, Jr. et al v. Curry et al
as 4:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Estate of Harold Waymon English, Jr. , Harold English and Sara English
Defendant:
Mark Curry, Sid Fitch, Lonnie Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon et al v. American Web Loan, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
Royce Solomon , Jodi Belleci , Michael Littlejohn and others
Defendant:
American Web Loan, Inc., AWL, Inc., Mark Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson v. Oats et al
as 4:2017cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jay Henderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Tommy Oats and Mark Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Currie v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04568
Plaintiff:
Mark Currie
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hemingway v. Hill et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Lamon Taneal Hemingway, Sr.
Defendant:
Nina Hill, Kimberly Delisle, Micheal Loomes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LA Container Inc et al v. International Gold Star Products Inc et al
as 8:2013cv01402
Defendant:
Mark Currie and International Gold Star Products Inc
Plaintiff:
LA Container Inc and Steven Loritz
Carter v. Muhlenberg County Detention Center et al
as 4:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Rodney Henry Carter
Defendant:
Muhlenberg County Detention Center, Mark Curry, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Curry et al
as 4:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jerome Franklin
Defendant:
Mark Curry and Josh Radar Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelker v. Geneva Roth Capital et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Kelker
Defendant:
Geneva Roth Capital and Mark Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
