Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Becker v. United States Postal Service et al
as 8:2020cv00394
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Postmaster General, Mark Dimondstein and others
Plaintiff:
Susanne Becker and Susanne R. Hurd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mark Dimondstein v. Jerry Stidman, et al
as 19-7161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Dimondstein, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
Jonathan Kelley, an individual and Jerry Stidman, an individual
Holmes v. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO et al
as 1:2019cv05725
Defendant:
Chicago Local 0001 Union, Mark Dimondstein, Idowu Balogun and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIMONDSTEIN v. STIDMAN et al
as 1:2019cv02474
Defendant:
Jonathan Kelley and Jerry Stidman
Plaintiff:
MARK DIMONDSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Serna v. National American Postal Workers Union-AFL-CIO et al
as 5:2017cv01231
Defendant:
Letty Alejandro, Alejandro Aleman, American Postal Workers Union San Antonio Alamo Area Local 0195 and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Serna
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TAYLOR et al v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION et al
as 2:2015cv04873
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. TAYLOR, BRUCE KETTER and DONALD FREDERICK
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, MARK DIMONDSTEIN, PHILADELPHIA, PA AREA LOCAL 89 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
DIMONDSTEIN et al v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
as 1:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
MARK DIMONDSTEIN , TONY MCKINNON and VIOLETTA WARD
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
DIMONDSTEIN v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
as 1:2010cv00840
Plaintiff:
MARK DIMONDSTEIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
