Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Matthew Locke v. County of Hubbard, et al
as 24-1285
Plaintiff:
Matthew Locke
Defendant:
County of Hubbard, Cory Aukes, in his official and individual capacity and Scott Parks, in his official and individual capacity
Locke v. County of Hubbard et al
as 0:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Matthew Locke
Defendant:
County of Hubbard, Cory Aukes and Scott Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Locke v. Pham
as 4:2022cv01108
Plaintiff:
Randolph Matthew Locke
Defendant:
Nancy Pham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
White v. Strafford County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01059
Defendant:
Haden Wilber, Matthew Locke, Thomas Lydon and others
Plaintiff:
Robyn White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Harvey v. Pulaski Bank STL et al
as 4:2010cv00553
Plaintiff:
Alfred D. Harvey, Jr.
Defendant:
Pulaski Bank STL, W. Thomas Reeves, Gary Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
