Cases 1 - 10 of 11
David Meyers v. Kevin Krebs
as 21-6657
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD VORHIS, Assistant Attorney General, SUPERINTENDENT, Virginia State Police, MARK HERRING, Virginia Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
McGuire et al v. Schipper Group Limited et al
as 5:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Matthew McGuire and Michael Cooper
Defendant:
Brad Cvammen, Waterford Village Apartments Limited Partnership, Waterford Village Apartments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGUIRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51448
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCGUIRE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGUIRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77042
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCGUIRE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGuire v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 0:2014cv01220
Plaintiff:
Matthew McGuire
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthew McGuire v. Michigan Department of Communi, et al
as 12-1378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW MCGUIRE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, THE MOUNT PLEASANT CENTER and KENNETH T. LONGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY SHEETS, ROOSEVELT ABRAHAM, MICHAEL BORIE and others
Matthew McGuire v. John Fayram
as 11-1370
Petitioner - Appellant:
Matthew McGuire
Respondent - Appellee:
John Fayram, Warden
McGuire v. Fayram
as 1:2010cv00143
Petitioner:
Matthew McGuire
Respondent:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harley v. State Of SC et al
as 3:2010cv02296
Petitioner:
Thomas Harley
Respondent:
State Of SC, County of Orangeburg, Roger Heaton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
