Cases 61 - 70 of 4,987
USA v. Christopher McDaniels
as 24-1243
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MCDANIELS
McDaniel v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
John McDaniel
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
McDaniel v. Garrett et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Nicholas McDaniel
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Joshua McDaniel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Brooklyn Bedding LLC
as 3:2024cv05100
Plaintiff:
Deborah McDaniel
Defendant:
Brooklyn Bedding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Nuttall v. Michigan City City of et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tracey Nuttall and Tracey Nuttall personal representative
Defendant:
City of Michigan City, Michigan City Police Officer Matthew Babcock, Michigan City Police Officer Rene Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Deborah McDaniel
Defendant:
Brooklyn Bedding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
