Cases 31 - 40 of 117,534
Robert Foster v. Bryan Stirling
as 24-6414
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE FOSTER
Defendant:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, MEDICAL BRANCH and LARRY POWELL, Director of Spartanburg County Jail
Jesse Perez v. Mohammed Siddiqui
as 24-1766
Plaintiff:
JESSE R. PEREZ
Defendant:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Medical Director, Wexford
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2798
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BAILEY
Defendant:
MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MICHAEL REESE, CPT. ERIC P. SMITH and others
Vanderlan v. Jackson HMA
as 24-60215
Plaintiff:
W. Blake Vanderlan, medical doctor, relator
Defendant:
Jackson HMA, L.L.C., doing business as Central Mississippi Medical Center, also known as Merit Health Central - Jackson
Riley v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Renee Ronatta Riley
Defendant:
Russell Skinner, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parteh v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Slawannie Louisa Parteh
Defendant:
Russ Skinner, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffry v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Stephany Rosmary Jeffry
Defendant:
Russell Skinner, Maricopa County Estrella Jail, CHS Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
