Cases 1 - 10 of 382
Hyper Ice, Inc. et al v. Meijer Inc
as 1:2024cv03311
Plaintiff:
Hyper Ice, Inc. and Hyperice IP Subco, LLC
Defendant:
Meijer Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Garnett v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Garnett
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership, Meijer, Inc., Meijer Companies, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Owen v. Meijer, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
James R. Owen
Defendant:
Meijer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Shire LLC et al v. Meijer, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10479
Petitioner:
Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc.
Respondent:
Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distributions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv12652
Defendant:
Sanofi GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC and Sanofi-Aventis Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff:
RDC Liquidating Trust, by and through its trustee, Advisory Trust Group LLC, MLI Rx LLC, Burlington Drug Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff:
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner:
MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master:
JOSE L. LINARES
In Re:
LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor:
MYLAN INC.
Interested Party:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re:
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party:
MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC et al (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)
as 1:2016cv12653
Defendant:
Shire PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and BI-LO, LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
