Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kotevski v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton, Estate of George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Petersen v. Meta, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dr. John Emil Petersen
Defendant:
Meta, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Wescott v. Meta, Inc.
as 5:2023cv06177
Plaintiff:
Carl A. Wescott
Defendant:
Meta, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Muhammad Umair Nabeel v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07452
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Umair Nabeel
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Universal Music Group, Inc., July Moon Productions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thornton v. Meta, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Brian Anthony Thornton, Brian A. Thornton and JT
Defendant:
Meta, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cohen v. Meta, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10470
Plaintiff:
Adam Harris Cohen
Defendant:
Meta, Inc., Neil Billock, Vertical Direct Marketing Group and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hall v. Meta, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03063
Plaintiff:
James A. Hall
Defendant:
Meta, Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Amro Elansari v. Meta Inc
as 22-3060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMRO A. ELANSARI
Defendant / Appellee:
META INC, doing business as FACEBOOK
ELANSARI v. META, INC.
as 2:2021cv05325
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Defendant:
META, INC. doing business as FACEBOOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Anitian Corporation v. Sherlock Meta, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Sherlock Meta, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anitian Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
