Cases 1 - 10 of 99
SCUTERI v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CARGILL MANUFACTURING, INCORPORATED, GOOD SOURCE SOLUTIONS and others
Interested Party:
GLENN ANDREW SCUTERI, TIFFANY ROSE SCUTERI and TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birch v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Birch
Defendant:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Joseph Michael Andrews v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Covello
as 5:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kitchen v. McDonald et al
as 2:2023cv13075
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Kitchen
Defendant:
Karen D. McDonald, Marilyn Day, Rae Ann Ruddy and others
Wood v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01522
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Wood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wood v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01521
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Wood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Andrews v. Rico et al
as 1:2023cv06968
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrews
Defendant:
EDNY EMS Kevin Rico, NYPD Officer Evans, NYC Health Hospitals Queens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Peterson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
