Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Peterson v. Wallens Ridge State Prison
as 7:2021cv00065
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Bank
as 3:2020cv04015
Defendant:
Michael Andrew Bank
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Birchfield v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00228
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Birchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 20-1736
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY K. SMITH, District Court Administrative Clerk, JOYCE SCHAUM, Contractor with CONMED, UNIDENTIFIED CONTRACTOR, CONMED and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Michael Andrew Joslin v Warden Paul Adams
as 1:2019cv00223
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Joslin
Respondent:
Warden Paul Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joslin v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2019cv00219
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Joslin
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nosal v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00419
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Nosal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Doe v. DeWees et al
as 8:2018cv02014
Defendant:
Michael Andrews, Unidentified contractor, Joyce Schaum and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Owunna v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00536
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Owunna
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Customs and Border Protection, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dew et al v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Company, et al
as 5:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Duane Edward Eaton, Randy Thompson, Thomas Roland Seals and others
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, The Chemours Company and The Chemours Company FC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
