Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leyshon v. Duncan et al
as 5:2020cv00157
Defendant:
Matthew Levchuk, Pam Barlow, B. Carlton Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edwin Leyshon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZPATRICK v. TOWNSHIP OF HAZLET et al
as 3:2020cv01779
Defendant:
ROBERT J. DICKENS, JOHN DOES 6-10, MICHAEL DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Carolina Politics Club v. Osborne et al
as 2:2018cv02335
Defendant:
Jill Caldwell, Brian R McGee, Christine Workman and others
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Politics Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery Riggsbee v. US
as 15-1104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVERY M. RIGGSBEE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WENDY A. OWENS, J. MICHAEL DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08801
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RIGGSBEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00563
Plaintiff:
AVERY M. RIGGSBEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WENDY A. OWENS, J. MICHAEL DUNCAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Norman v. Lowes Home Improvement et al
as 8:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
Rahmad Norman
Defendant:
Lowes Home Improvement, Elaine Doe and Michael Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliott v. Pike County School District et al
as 3:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Elliott
Defendant:
Pike County School District, Pike County School District, Pike County Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
