Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dobronski v. UTEC IT, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12736
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
UTEC IT, LLC and Jacob Michael Emmett
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Muthuswamy v. Liberto et al
as 2:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Ryan Carruth, Covington City, Laura Aucoin and others
Plaintiff:
Murthy Muthuswamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe #275844 v. LaLonde et al
as 2:2016cv00231
Plaintiff:
Michael Emmett Wolfe #275844
Defendant:
Unknown LaLonde, Unknown Isard, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmett et al v. Ethicon Women's Health and Urology et al
as 2:2013cv32736
Plaintiff:
Suzanne M. Emmett and Michael Emmett
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology , Gynecare , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMMETT et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLGY et al
as PAE/5:13-cv-05299
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE M. EMMETT and MICHAEL EMMETT
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLGY , GYNECARE , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
EMMETT et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLGY et al
as 5:2013cv05299
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE M. EMMETT and MICHAEL EMMETT
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLGY , GYNECARE , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Emmett v. Kwik Lok Corporation
as 12-3821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EMMETT
Defendant - Appellee:
KWIK LOK CORPORATION
Wolfe #275844 v. McKee
as 1:2012cv00600
Petitioner:
Michael Emmett Wolfe #275844
Respondent:
Kenneth McKee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Beck v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael Emmett Beck
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
