Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Winn v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
James L. Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Sheriff Deputy Zachary Cuonzo-Simmons, Sheriff Deputy Brandon Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. USA
as 22-40184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bonnie Burnette Erwin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Michael Horowitz, Jeff Baney and others
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv03494
Defendant:
Nate Wackman, Sanford Roth, William Marback and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allee v. Streeval et al
as 7:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Justin J. Allee
Defendant:
Saders, Streeval, Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ronald Rollings v. Michael Horowitz
as 2:2021cv01158
Defendant:
Michael Horowitz
Petitioner:
Ronald Rollings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. LONDON BRIDGE KNIFE ATTACK et al
as 2:2019cv21863
Respondent:
CITY OF LONDON, ORLANDO HARPER, MAYOR, JERSEY CITY, NJ and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Erwin v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions/Medical League Concepts, Mark Inch, Secretary of State of Washington DC and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Burnette Erwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
