Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Huffman v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Kevin Michael Huffman
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Kevin Huffman
as 22-6874
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL HUFFMAN
Huffman v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00627
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Huffman
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BROWN v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv01706
Plaintiff:
EBEN BROWN
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JUDGE ANTHONY M. MARIANI, BRANDON HERRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Huffman v. Granite Services International, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv01184
Plaintiff:
Michael Huffman
Defendant:
Granite Services International, Inc. and Fieldcore Service Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huffman v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv00585
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Dynax Corporation, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giles v. City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2020cv05119
Defendant:
City of Mount Vernon, David Sanchez, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUFFMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14691
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUFFMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv01779
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huffman v. Unknown Arresting U.S. Marshals
as 2:2019cv00621
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Huffman
Defendant:
Unknown Arresting U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
