Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Jordan v. Lamb et al
as 3:2017cv00207
Plaintiff:
Pierre Jordan
Defendant:
Michael Lamb, Russell Goins, Dr Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lambe et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv14888
Plaintiff:
Julie Lambe and Michael Lambe
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamb v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company
as 1:2015cv02773
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamb
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kinekt Design v. One Moment In Time et al
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kinekt Design
Defendant:
One Moment In Time, Mormon Gift Shop, Latter Day Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
LAMB et al v. DIRECTOR OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 3:2013cv06526
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAMB and KELLY LAMB
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
KINEKT DESIGN, LLC v. ONE MOMENT IN TIME, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv07683
Plaintiff:
KINEKT DESIGN, LLC
Defendant:
ONE MOMENT IN TIME, LLC, MORMON GIFT SHOP, LATTER DAY PRODUCTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Beasley v. Ivy et al
as 6:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
Paul Beasley
Defendant:
Larry Ivy, Donna Kazmierczak, Vernon L Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Balestrieri, et al v. Menlo Park Fire Protection Di
as 12-15975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE BALESTRIERI, KEN BABCOCK, ROBERT S. BLACK, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MENLO PARK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
eHealthPartners, Inc. v. Lamb et al
as 2:2011cv02412
Plaintiff:
eHealthPartners, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Lamb and John Doe Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Kiessel, et al v. Leelanau County, et al
as 10-2602
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES KIESSEL, MICHAEL LAMB, MICHAEL BANKEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL OLTERSDORF, Leelanau County Sheriff, SCOTT WOOTERS, Undersheriff and COUNTY OF LEELANAU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
