Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 63
LOVE v. CALOCA-JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00112
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LOVE
Defendant: DAWN CALOCA-JOHNSON and MARYANN WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2010cv81504
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Loving v. USA
as 6:2010cv00086
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Stephen Michael Loving
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Love v. Neverkewitz et al
as 2:2010cv01290
Plaintiff: Michael Love
Defendant: Walter J Neverkewitz, Julie Neverkewitz and Northwest Technical Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
LOVELY v. USA
as 2:2010cv00079
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: MICHAEL LOVELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2310
Plaintiff: DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant: RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellant: CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Movant - Interested Party: MA PAROLE BOARD
Thompson, et al v. Torres, et al
as 09-2139
Plaintiff: DARREL ALLEN, KEVIN BACCHUS, ANTHONY BOVA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONNELL THOMPSON
Defendant: RICHARD J. ROUSE, SUFFOLK COUNTY, RICHARD FEENEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECTION OFFICER WILLIAM TORRES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02412
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Love v. Norris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00052
Plaintiff: Michael Love
Defendant: Larry Norris
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Lovely We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1371
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL LOVELY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?