Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department et al
as 5:2024ct03068
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Windsor Police Department, City of Windsor, Bertie County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Rankins v. Michael Carvajal
as 22-6322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of Bureau of Prisons, J.C. PETRUCC, Regional Director, JOHN OR JANE DOE, Food Service Administrator and others
Rankins v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Michael D. Carvajal, J. C. Petrucc, John or Jane Doe and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rankins v. Young
as 5:2021cv00500
Petitioner:
Michael Rankins
Respondent:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANKINS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2020cv00282
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, J.E. KRUEGER, UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00212
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, J. E. KRUEGER, B. LAMMER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANKINS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2019cv00165
Defendant:
J. LAMPING, UNITED STATES, DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RANKINS V. KELLER ET AL
as 1:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR., REUBEN F. YOUNG and ROBERT C. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANKINS v. KELLER et al
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant:
ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR., REUBEN F. YOUNG, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Keller et al
as 5:2012ct03037
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller, Jr., Reuben F. Young and Robert C. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
