Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Carl Seibert v. Jeremy McIntire, et al
as 20-11931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL MICHAEL SEIBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY MCINTIRE, personal capacity and his capacity as an attorney and ROMAN SHAUL, General Counsel
Seibert v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04703
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SEIBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seibert v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01108
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Seibert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seibert v. McIntire et al
as 5:2019cv01619
Plaintiff:
Carl Michael Seibert
Defendant:
Roman Shaul and Jeremy McIntire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrett et al v Waupaca Foundry
as 1:2018cv01186
Plaintiff:
Darrell McCarthy, Jason Stallings, Thomas Marshall and others
Defendant:
Waupaca Foundry Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SEIBERT v. PRECISION CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS, LP et al
as 1:2018cv00818
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SEIBERT
Defendant:
PRECISION CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS, LP, DERRICK SIEBER and STEPHEN C. SIEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seibert v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Michael Seibert
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Seibert v. The Ritz Carlton Hotel Company, LLC
as 3:2017cv03650
Plaintiff:
Michael Seibert
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc., The Ritz Carlton Hotel Company, LLC and Ritz Carlton-Half Moon Bay, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seibert v. Dorning et al
as 5:2017cv00918
Petitioner:
Carl Michael Seibert
Respondent:
Blake Dorning and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Seibert v. Secretary, FL DOC
as 16-15429
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SEIBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
