Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Hall v. Jackson
as 2:2023cv04606
Plaintiff:
Beresford A. Hall
Defendant:
Suffolk County, Sufolk County 3rd PCT Police Department, PO Todd Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Preble County Ohio Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D. Reed
Defendant:
Preble County Ohio Sheriff Department and Michael Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Reed v. Preble County Ohio Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D. Reed
Defendant:
Preble County Ohio Sheriff Department and Michael Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Montana v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2018cv01045
Plaintiff:
Elliot Montana
Defendant:
John Doe, Tracy Falgout, Michael Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Ron Davis, Williams Dawson, Michael Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. GARMON et al
as 2:2016cv01810
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SIMPSON
Respondent:
MARK GARMON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simpson v. Lind et al
as 1:2015cv02536
Petitioner:
Norman Michael Simpson
Respondent:
Randy Lind , Rick Raemicsh , Branden Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simpson v. Virga et al
as 2:2015cv02247
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
T. Virga, J. Macomber, D. Baughman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Matevousian
as 1:2015cv01310
Petitioner:
Michael Simpson
Respondent:
Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simpson v. Overbaugh et al
as 9:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Michael Overbaugh, Raymond Catina, Vincent Cuda, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
