Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Young v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Young et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Raymond William Mann
Defendant:
Michael Young, Jonathan Watkins and Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann v. Young et al
as 6:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond William Mann
Defendant:
Michael Young, Jonathan Watkins and Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv03454
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, A. Morrell, Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephenson Smith v. Sheriff, DeKalb County Georgia, et al
as 23-11474
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERIFF, DEKALB COUNTY GEORGIA, APD OFFICER A. MORELL, Zone #6, APD OFFICER MURRAY, #2604 and others
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, APD Officer A. Morell, APD Officer Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, A. Morell, Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dan Michael Young v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2021cv06069
Petitioner:
Dan Michael Young
Respondent:
Warden Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hale v. Young et al
as 1:2021cv00623
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Hale
Defendant:
Michael Young, Vital Core Health Stratagies, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
