Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Ramos v. Walmart, et al.
as 1:2013cv01334
Plaintiff:
Frank L Ramos
Defendant:
Walmart, Mike Matthews, Mike Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith Communications, LLC an Arkansas limited liability company v. Washington County, Arkansas
as 5:2013cv05152
Plaintiff:
Smith Communications, LLC an Arkansas limited liability company
Defendant:
Washington County, Arkansas
Movant:
Gary Scott , Cathy Scott , Jerry Caudle and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996
William Harris v. Patricia Lykos, et al
as 13-20361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA LYKOS and MIKE ANDERSON, Current District Attorney
Darries v. Judge Krocker et al
as 4:2013cv01582
Petitioner:
Willis Darries
Respondent:
Judge Krocker, Mike Anderson and Cornelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Anderson et al
as 4:2013cv01199
Defendant:
Mike Anderson, Pat Lykos and Jan Krocker
Plaintiff:
David Tyrone Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Anderson et al
as 4:2013cv01118
Petitioner:
Clifton Lyn Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Mike Anderson and Carolina Wolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eberhardt v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bruce Eberhardt
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Main v. Anderson et al
as 1:2012cv00968
Plaintiff:
Roy J. Main
Defendant:
Mike Anderson and Pat Waak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Parsons, Jr.
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Jackson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
