Cases 31 - 40 of 2,274
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Montgomery County, MD v. Banerjee
as 8:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Montgomery County, MD
Defendant:
Mithun Banerjee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Banerjee v. Gelber et al
as 8:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee
Defendant:
Judge Rand Lewis Gelber, Admin Judge Sherri D. Koch, Judge John C. Moffett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lietzke v. Montgomery County of et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery County of, Reese McKinney and DT Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
English v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
James-Thomas English
Defendant:
The United States Of America, Montgomery County Courthouse, State Of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Galynsky v. Thomas et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Louis Galynsky
Defendant:
Janeice Thomas, Luke Vannorman, Molly McCutchen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kraniak v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Patrick Richard Kraniak
Defendant:
Montgomery County and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09 Application for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
