Cases 41 - 50 of 54
TEMPLIN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE OF ADULT PROBATION-PAROLE et al
as 2:2015cv00722
Petitioner:
FRANCIS E. TEMPLIN
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE OF ADULT PROBATION-PAROLE, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and WARDEN - MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baldwin v. Montgomery County Court System
as 1:2014cv01355
Plaintiff:
David T. Baldwin
Defendant:
Montgomery County Court System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-10918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE: Danny W. Alcorn
as 3:2013cv00311
Petitioner:
Danny W Alcorn
Defendant:
State Of Ohio, Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas and Miamisburg Municipal Court of Miamisburg, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
GARRICK v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv05402
Plaintiff:
KERIUM ALLEN GARRICK, SR.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NORRISTOWN, PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEMPLIN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2013cv03513
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS E. TEMPLIN
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Allen v. PA Common Pleas Court, et al
as 12-3680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ERIC ALLEN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS COURT, ADA MR GENOVESE, PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSN, Norristown B. and others
TILLIO v. KENT et al
as 2:2012cv01436
Plaintiff:
PATRICK TILLIO, JR.
Defendant:
GERRY KENT, ROCIA NELL, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
