Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Walters et al
as 7:2026cv00558
Plaintiff:
David Allen Dean
Defendant:
Joseph W. Walters, Richard Alsbrook, Ms. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morey v. AdaptHealth Corp.
as 2:2026cv04743
Plaintiff:
Pamela Morey
Defendant:
AdaptHealth Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Daley v. Dolby et al
as 1:2026cv12605
Plaintiff:
Craig Daley
Defendant:
Christopher Dolby, Zach Moreis, Troy Vanderhoop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05305
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bahr v. Morey
as 2:2026cv02244
Plaintiff:
Steven Bahr
Defendant:
Quentin Morey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Sturrup v. Morey's Seafood International LLC et al
as 0:2026cv02088
Defendant:
Morey's Seafood International LLC and Rich Products Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jumal E. Sturrup
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Day et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2026cv00096
Plaintiff:
Victoria I. Day and Karen L. Morey
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, John Swing and Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Sim v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2026cv01563
Plaintiff:
Eric Sim
Defendant:
CITY OF HOUSTON, KATELYN HOWTON, Kirsten Koryciak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
