Cases 51 - 60 of 1,551
May v. Paults et al
as 7:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. May
Defendant:
Kevin Paults, Middle River Jail and Staff and Chuck D. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ashmore v. Morris Manning & Martin LLP
as 6:2023cv04592
Plaintiff:
Beattie B Ashmore
Defendant:
Morris Manning & Martin LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Federal Receiver Case to Disgorge Profits
Julia Kim v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc.
as 23-1905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIA KIM, DAVID SYDNEY, MARTIN NOVICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC., BRUCE J. SCHANZER, GREGG A. GONSALVES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Sherbert et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04191
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Sherbert, Jerry Wayne Morris, Albert Mount and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
David Blevins v. Kathi Vidal
as 23-1828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PATRICK BLEVINS
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHI VIDAL, KEISHA MORRIS, BRIANA ROBINSON and others
Clem v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jason Clem
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton, Bernard Morris, Lyons Sanchezconcha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Donna Jean Morris
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
