Cases
AITKEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00197
Plaintiff: STEVEN MICHAEL AITKEN
Defendant: MR R DIXON, MR CONNER, R DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELTY v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff: JOSEPH WELTY
Defendant: MR. ANDERSON, MR. LONG, MR. CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Hoppensted et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00654
Plaintiff: David Robert Bentz
Defendant: James Hoppensted, Lieutenant Whitley, Kent Brookman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Rodgers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00015
Plaintiff: James Dennis Perkins
Respondent: David Rodgers, Mr. Conner, Bowie County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2013cv01639
Plaintiff: James Dennis Perkins
Defendant: David Rodgers, Mr. Conner, Bowie County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Sturch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00406
Plaintiff: Woodrow Valasta Davis
Defendant: Bill Sturch , Ken Goldman , John Kitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blonski, Sr. v. CACH, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00100
Plaintiff: John Blonski, Sr
Defendant: CACH, LLC, Law Office of Joe Pezzuto, LLC, Mr. Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Blonski, Jr. v. CACH, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Plaintiff: John Blonski, Jr
Defendant: CACH, LLC, Law Office of Joe Pezzuto, LLC, Mr. Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grant v. Callahan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00965
Plaintiff: Delbert George Grant
Defendant: Dennis Callahan, T C Peterson, Ken Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?