Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Derrick Brunson v. K. Nichols, et al
as 14-31350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK D. L. BRUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
K. NICHOLS, MR. LEWIS, M. WHITE and others
Latham v. Kletcheck et al
as 3:2014cv01173
Plaintiff:
John Latham
Defendant:
Benjamin Kletcheck, Frank Guyon, Mr. Orona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tedesco v. Annucci et al
as 2:2014cv01054
Defendant:
All Person(s) N.C.C.C., Anthony Annucci, Armor Correctional Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tedesco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. HCA-Rouse et al
as 2:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
HCA-Rouse, Nurse Dilly, BOMS-Bureau of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Dr. Camacho et al
as 3:2013cv01108
Plaintiff:
William James, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Camacho, Dr. Springer, Mr. Norkavags and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yzaguirre v. Zoley et al
as 2:2013cv00654
Plaintiff:
David Yzaguirre
Defendant:
George Zoley, Flavia Epps, Captain Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv05319
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Butler
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Mr Sanchez, Mrs Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Cartledge et al
as 9:2013cv01912
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M Arnold
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney, Mrs Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
N.G. v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2013cv04985
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Mr. Davis, Does and others
Plaintiff:
N. G.
Hinojos v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv01900
Plaintiff:
Mario Ramos Hinojos, Jr
Defendant:
William Byars, Michael McCall, Anthony Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
