Cases 11 - 20 of 597
Murphy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Flagler County)
as 3:2023cv01012
Petitioner:
Clarence E. Murphy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03163
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. HARPER
as 2:2023cv01562
Petitioner:
DYLONDRIA MURPHY
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02888
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02805
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfred Murphy v. Raymond Madden
as 23-55521
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFRED MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Murphy v. El Paso Co. (CO) Dist. 4 District Attorney
as 23-1188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS ALLEN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
EL PASO CO. (CO) DIST. 4 DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Murphy v. Unknown Party
as 3:2023cv08083
Petitioner:
Annette Theadora Murphy
Respondent:
Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cimbollek v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2023cv01805
Petitioner:
Robert Murphy Cimbollek
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, County of Union and Director of Union County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
